Blog

How much do you currently spend each year buying certainty?Take more risk..... a statement that will make many finance professionals uncomfortable.Good.When Interest rate differentials are low or positive, buying certainty is logical.The decision is easy....Hedge....Protect the budget.Move on.So what if your company is not in that luxurious position.Imagine you're the CFO of a European business with $50 million of annual US revenue.If interest rate differentials mean a straightforward 12-month hedge costs around 1.5%, you've already committed around $750,000 before dealing spreads, hedge accounting, audit requirements, treasury administration and management time.You've paid a lot for certainty before the exchange rate has moved by a single cent.Here's my question.If another supplier increased your costs by almost $1 million a year, would you simply accept the invoice?Or would you challenge it?That's exactly how CFOs should think about FX hedging.When certainty is cheap, keep your strategy simple and spend your time elsewhere.When certainty becomes expensive, spend more time on treasury—not less.&nbsp;If you dont have the time, find an expert you trust to help.That doesn't mean speculating on currencies.It means asking whether the business really needs to pay for 100% certainty, or whether accepting a measured amount of FX risk could materially reduce the total cost of managing that exposure.The role of a CFO isn't to eliminate risk.It's to make the best economic decision.Sometimes...taking a little more FX risk is the right financial decision. &nbsp;

CFOs & CEO's Should Take More FX Risk… Sometimes.

Without allowing North Sea Oil or Returning to EU, how can the GBP rise?The danger of Burnham shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic.The UK has spent decades under-investing in resilience.That is the uncomfortable point at the heart of the current debate about Britain’s economic model. It is tempting to frame the issue as public versus private ownership, or as a simple reversal of the 1980s. But that misses the deeper problem.The UK did not just spend the peace dividend. It spent the depreciation dividend.Infrastructure was allowed to age. Public services were squeezed. Energy security was treated as someone else’s problem. The City was treated as a golden goose. And the country became comfortable with an economic model that worked only while capital was cheap, globalisation was benign, and external shocks were rare.That world has gone!A currency rises when investors believe a country can generate better real growth, attract capital, control inflation risk, and maintain fiscal credibility.So what would make GBP structurally more attractive?The obvious answers are uncomfortable.First, energy. Britain’s reliance on imported or globally priced energy has left it vulnerable to shocks. More domestic oil and gas would not be a complete strategy, but it would fit the resilience argument. If the UK can reduce external energy vulnerability, it reduces one source of pressure on inflation, household incomes, the current account and industrial competitiveness. How do we bring the debt down?Second, Europe. Brexit damaged the UK’s market access, weakened the stock market ecosystem, and reduced the attractiveness of the UK as a base for capital. A closer relationship with the EU, or eventually rejoining, would be one of the clearest ways to restore scale, credibility and investment appeal.Without those two levers, the path for GBP is harder.That leaves a Burnham government, or any UK government, needing to do three things at once:Be fiscally credible Do not scare the gilt market. If investors think fiscal rules are being loosened without a credible plan, sterling will struggle.Protect investment Fiscal tightening may be necessary, but cutting public investment again would repeat the mistake of the past 40 years. The UK cannot rebuild resilience by cancelling the spending that creates it.Build a new productive model The old City-led model is not enough. The UK stock market is shrinking, listings are leaving, and financial services alone cannot carry the economy. Britain needs a path back to the EU to survive.&nbsp;That is the narrow road for GBP.The market is clearly positioned for what i am talking about as we observed when a credible chancellor was announced, the GBP rallied. The enthusiasm will soon wear off however if Burnham choses not to acknowledge the simple reality that the UK has very few options and this is not the time to shuffle deck chairs on the Titanic. Activate to view larger image,&nbsp; See content credentials Activate to view larger image, &nbsp;

Without allowing North Sea Oil or Returning to EU, how can the GBP rise?

“If AI can improve every forecast in your business, why is FX forecasting still largely judgemental?”Every CFO I speak to is investing in AI.a&gt; Sales forecasting. b&gt; Demand planning. c&gt; Inventory optimisation. d&gt; Working capital. e&gt; Cash forecasting.Yet one area is still surprisingly reliant on instinct, opinion and whatever the bank happened to say last week.Foreign exchange!The irony is that FX isn’t usually a forecasting problem.It’s a decision problem.Nobody consistently knows where EUR/USD or GBP/USD will trade six months from now. If they did, they wouldn’t be running a treasury department.But that’s often how companies behave.- Someone has a view. &nbsp;-The board becomes optimistic or pessimistic. &nbsp;- The market moves. &nbsp;- A hedge is delayed, accelerated or abandoned.The result isn’t better forecasting.It’s simply emotion dressed up as strategy.I think AI can genuinely transform corporate treasury. Not because it will magically predict exchange rates. It can dramatically improve the quality and consistency of the decisions surrounding them.Imagine an AI system that continuously asks questions such as:• How exposed are we today compared with last month? &nbsp;• What would a 10% currency move do to EBITDA? &nbsp;• Are we operating within our board-approved policy? &nbsp;• Have our budget assumptions materially changed? &nbsp;• Are we over- or under-hedged relative to our risk appetite? &nbsp;• Which decisions are genuinely new, and which are simply emotional reactions to market moves?Notice what’s missing.“Where will EUR/USD be in December?”That’s often the least useful question.The companies that manage currency risk best aren’t necessarily better forecasters.They’re better decision-makers. They have clearer frameworks. More consistent processes. Better governance. Less emotion.I suspect AI’s biggest contribution to treasury won’t be replacing judgement. It will be removing the noise that too often masquerades as judgement. Perhaps the future of FX isn’t an AI that predicts the market. It’s an AI that helps finance teams make better decisions regardless of what the market does. That’s a much more achievable and valuable goal.What do you think?Will AI eventually become a decision-support tool for treasury, or do you believe currency management will always remain primarily a human judgement?

If AI can improve every forecast in your business, why is FX forecasting still largely judgemental?

Make money in FX from low volatility....Low volatility is not just a market condition. It is a trade setup.When realised volatility falls, investors are encouraged to take more risk. Carry trades get larger. Option sellers become more comfortable. Vol-targeting and risk-budgeted portfolios can increase exposure.That can make low volatility self-reinforcing:Low vol -&gt; more carry -&gt; tighter ranges -&gt; lower vol -&gt; more carry.But the better opportunity is not simply to sell volatility.It is to ask:Which volatility is overpriced because the market is trapped, and which volatility is underpriced because the market is asleep?In FX, that question is especially useful. Some pairs are genuinely range-bound because policy, carry and flows are aligned. Others look quiet even though the catalyst set is improving.The trade is to sell the vol that should not realise, and use it to buy the vol that should.One expression of that idea is: Buy GBP/JPY movement, funded by selling GBP/USD movement. Using the 1-month option prices shown: GBP/JPY Buy the 50-delta put Buy the 50-delta call Sell the 10-delta put Sell the 10-delta callThat is a long GBP/JPY straddle, partly funded by selling the 10-delta wings.Then fund it with GBP/USD: Sell the 50-delta put Sell the 50-delta call Sell the 10-delta put Sell the 10-delta callConverted at the implied USD/JPY cross of roughly 161.4, that is worth about:The idea is simple:Own movement in GBP/JPY. Sell movement in GBP/USD.This is not just a directional GBP trade.&nbsp;It is a relative volatility trade.You want GBP/JPY to move more than GBP/USD. You are effectively saying that JPY is the currency where the real optionality sits because this is not equilibrium for the Japanese Yen, while GBP/USD is more likely to remain contained.The structure works if GBP/JPY breaks meaningfully while GBP/USD stays relatively range-bound.It struggles if GBP/USD starts moving hard in either direction, because the funding leg is short a lot of GBP/USD volatility.And because the 10-delta wings are sold, this is not a pure long-vol trade. It is long the middle of the GBP/JPY distribution and short the tails in both pairs, especially GBP/USD. Experience has shown me that even big moves need you to take profits in FX so selling the wings is sensible.That is the broader low-volatility lesson. In quiet markets, the best trade is often not simply “buy vol” or “sell vol.”It is: Sell the volatility that should not realise, and use it to buy the volatility that should.Or more bluntly: Sell gamma where the market is trapped. Buy gamma where the market is asleep.#FX #Volatility #GBPJPY #GBPUSD #Options #Macro #CarryTrade #RiskManagement

Make money in FX from low volatility....

<figure id="figure-8lfi16j2wpmrdntz79"><img id="8lfi16j2wpmrdntz79" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/20UYifWcN4ZsZjHJBiAnJcK9VOu2LLMpOt7CnhrmOrrnhQM9ky0cVWfZHlzM5VGf.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: 0% 50%;" data-corners="no-rounded" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="0%" data-positionY="50%" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>How many G10 central bankers does it take to change a lightbulb?Just one. But they will hold rates steady for two years to see if the lightbulb changes itself.Central bank language is starting to matter again for FX, but not all “hawkish” signals are equal.I scored the latest G10 central bank communications using a language only framework across inflation concern, growth optimism, labour tightness, financial conditions, policy restrictiveness, forward guidance, growth concern and external vulnerability.I also double-weighted growth, because in this environment the question is not just “who sounds hawkish?” It is “whose economy can absorb tighter policy?”On this basis, the strongest language support sits with:USD NOK AUD JPY &amp; NZDThe key point is that USD screens best not because the Fed has delivered a fresh hawkish shift. It has not. The Fed minutes look more like hawkish continuity. But the Fed combines elevated inflation concern with the strongest growth language in the G10 set: solid activity, resilient consumption and strong AI-related investment.JPY is a special case. The 200+ % of gdp debt and currently rising rates puts it at idiosyncratic risk.The other important point: Europe is unloved in this framework.EUR, GBP, SEK and CHF all screen poorly or only neutrally.Why?EUR has inflation concern, but weak growth language. The ECB is worried about upside inflation risks, but also about downside growth risks, weaker confidence, tighter credit and energy-price damage. That is not a clean currency-supportive mix.GBP has a hawkish tail, with two BoE members voting for a hike. But the UK growth and labour language is soft: subdued underlying momentum, loosening labour market, weak demand and tighter household financing conditions. The market can respect the inflation risk while still disliking the growth backdrop.SEK has only modest support. The Riksbank acknowledges higher inflation risk and a greater probability of a rate rise later this year, but inflation is still below target and activity is weaker than normal. That makes the signal cautious rather than forceful.CHF is the weakest European signal. The SNB is at 0%, inflation is still within the price-stability range, and the central bank explicitly signals willingness to lean against excessive franc appreciation. From central-bank language alone, that is a clear headwind.

How many G10 central bankers does it take to change a lightbulb?

Doing nothing is still a currency decision.A surprising number of businesses believe they’re “unhedged” or “neutral,” when in reality they’re running a large, unintentional speculative position.I keep coming back to this: certainty has value.Too many management teams obsess over whether they got the absolute best FX rate, instead of asking the more important question:&nbsp;Did we improve budgeting confidence, pricing stability, and earnings visibility?The real goal of good FX management isn’t to maximise upside from currency moves - it’s to minimise the damage from adverse ones.Because in volatile markets, one lesson always holds:→ Markets can stay irrational longer than your business can stay exposed.The one goal is to build resilience and giving yourself the ability to operate confidently, no matter what the market does next.What’s one FX lesson you’ve learned the hard way? Activate to view larger image,&nbsp;

Doing nothing is still a currency decision.

Dragten Capital Solutions

Core Positioning Statement
Dragten Capital Solutions helps internationally exposed businesses manage foreign exchange risk with institutional-level FX expertise — without the institutional cost.
One-Line Value Proposition
We help businesses reduce the hidden cost of currency volatility.
Strategic Positioning
Most companies have FX exposure. Very few manage it strategically.
Large institutions have treasury teams, macro specialists and sophisticated risk frameworks. Most mid-sized businesses do not — despite currency movements having a direct impact on profitability, margins and cash flow.
Dragten Capital Solutions bridges that gap by bringing institutional-grade macro and FX expertise into a practical commercial setting.

Dragten Capital Solutions

Blog

CFOs & CEO's Should Take More FX Risk… Sometimes.

Without allowing North Sea Oil or Returning to EU, how ca...

If AI can improve every forecast in your business, why is...

Make money in FX from low volatility....

How many G10 central bankers does it take to change a lig...

Doing nothing is still a currency decision.